Published on:

State Supreme Court Determines Jurisdiction Issue in Texas Electrocution Case Supreme Court of Texas recently delivered an opinion addressing whether the Texas Public Utility Commission (PUC) has jurisdiction over a negligence case involving a good Samaritan. Here, the deceased was electrocuted while trying to help victims of a crash that caused a power line to fall. The good Samaritan’s estate and family filed a negligence lawsuit against the power line company, arguing that they were negligent in their duty to design, construct, operate, and maintain its electricity system. They asserted that the company failed to ensure that they would de-energize portions of the distribution lines when they experience faults.

The accident occurred when one vehicle ran a red light and hit a wooden utility pole maintained by the company. The man was driving past the scene when he stopped to help the accident victims. As he was walking, the man came into contact with electricity radiating through the ground. The shock knocked him to the ground and his clothes caught on fire; tragically, he passed away three weeks later from his injuries.

In response, the power company filed a plea arguing that Texas’ PUC maintains jurisdiction over the case. In support of their claim, the power company argued that PUC has exclusive jurisdiction over an electric company’s utility rates, operations, and services, extends to adjudicating whether a company complied with the law. The defendants argued that the plaintiffs’ complaints bring up fundamental questions about how a power company maintains its distribution systems. The plaintiffs argued that the case falls under the Texas Estates Code, and the probate court has jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter.

The Supreme Court answered two main questions in determining which entity has jurisdiction. First, while the probate court does not have exclusive or superior jurisdiction to adjudicate the plaintiffs’ claims, they can maintain concurrent jurisdiction with another applicable court. However, in this case, the PUC does not have exclusive jurisdiction to adjective common-law questions of reasonable care. The Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA) defines PUC’s jurisdiction to regulate utilities and adjudicate disputes. Here, the plaintiffs are not “affected persons” who may commence complaints at the PUC. The defendants contend that the plaintiffs are “affected persons” because PURA legislative text defines “affected persons’” as those who seek relief from PUC before proceeding to court. However, the Court concluded that the plaintiffs are not “affected persons’’ because none of the matters underlying their claims address statutory or regulatory violations related to utility rates or services. Further, neither PURA nor PUC regulations comment on fuse size or any industry standards that may clarify the company’s duty. Therefore, PUC cannot adjudicate their claims.

Have You Suffered Injuries in a Texas Accident

If you or someone you love has suffered severe injuries or died in a Texas accident, the lawyers at Carabin Shaw can help you understand your rights and effectuate your remedies. Our law firm was founded over 28 years ago, and we have maintained an active practice advocating and fighting for the rights of Texas injury victims. We handle claims stemming from Texas motor vehicle accidents, catastrophic injuries, premises liability, defective products, wrongful death, and medical malpractice. Contact our office at 800 862-1260 to learn how we can help you recover damages after an accident.

Contact Information