Articles Tagged with 18-wheeler accident

Published on:

truck accident lawsuit Texas, 18-wheeler accident lawyer, commercial vehicle injury claim, Texas truck crash attorney, San Antonio truck wreck case, how long truck accident case takes, trucking injury case timeline, truck crash lawsuit process, personal injury lawsuit duration, settlement or trial for truck accident, who’s at fault in truck accident, trucking company liability Texas, multiple party accident Texas, trucking negligence claim, truck driver injury lawsuit, free case evaluation truck accident, Carabin Shaw trucking injury lawyer, Texas personal injury attorney, truck crash legal advice, compensation for trucking accident, Call Shaw, Carabin Shaw, Injury Accident, Injury Help, Clients First.

Various factors influence the length of a truck accident claim.

How Long Does a Trucking Accident Case Usually Take in Texas?


Key Takeaway:
The length of a trucking accident case varies based on several factors, including identifying who’s at fault, the severity of the injury, settlement negotiations, and whether the case goes to trial.

Published on:

CS-San-Antonio-9-300x300The Supreme Court of Texas recently issued an opinion finding that a trial court abused its discretion in denying a defendant’s discovery request. The case arose after the plaintiff suffered injuries in a Texas car accident with a tractor-trailer driven by the defendant’s employee. After the accident, the parties took photos, exchanged identifying information, and drove away without reporting injuries. A few days after the accident, the plaintiff sought medical treatment and underwent several surgeries on his spine and shoulder. His medical providers charged him over one million dollars for the surgeries and treatment. The plaintiff did not pay for the care. His attorneys notified the healthcare providers that they would protect the healthcare providers’ interest if they settled the underlying personal injury lawsuit. However, they specified the settlement would only include reasonable and necessary medical charges.

During the trial, the defendants served subpoenas on the plaintiff’s healthcare providers. Specifically, they wanted information related to the providers’ billing practices and rates. Three of the providers filed motions to quash the subpoenas, and the trial court granted the motions. The defendant narrowed the requests, but the healthcare providers responded that the narrowed requests contained the same defects.

Under the rules of evidence, evidence is “relevant” if it has “any tendency” to make a fact more or less probable. For pre-trial discovery, evidence that may not be admissible at trial may still be permitted, so long as it’s “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” In the context of personal injury lawsuits, medical records and bills reasonably related to a party’s injuries or damages are typically relevant.

Contact Information